Monthly Archive: May 2024

Judge Rejects Murderer’s Bid to Vacate Death Sentence

A Santa Clara County Judge rejected condemned California murderer Richard Allen Davis’ petition to vacate his death sentence for the kidnap, rape and murder of a 12-year-old girl.  Louis Casiano and Audrey Conklin of Fox News report that the murderer’s attorneys argued that changes in state sentencing laws under Governor’s Brown and Newsom, including Newsom’s moratorium on executions, made Davis eligible for a reduced sentence. The judge was not buying, noting that the changes in the law allowed murderers sentenced to life without parole if they were 25 or younger at the time of the killing to ask for a lesser sentence, but did not include murderers sentenced to death. Davis kidnapped Polly Klaas from her bedroom in 1993, sexually assaulted her then killed her.  She was not found until Davis was arrested two months after her disappearance and led police to her body.  The case made national headlines and helped convince state voters to adopt the Three Strikes and Your Out, ballot measure.

Unconnected Mitigation Evidence in Capital Cases

Today the U.S. Supreme Court reversed a decision of the Ninth Circuit in a capital case, Thornell v. Jones. All but one of the Justices agreed that the panel decision was wrong. The Ninth Circuit itself refused to rehear this rogue decision over the dissents of ten of its judges. This is such a common occurrence it is hardly even news. The most newsworthy aspect of the case is that a solid majority of the Supreme Court is finally showing skepticism about the value of “background” mitigating evidence that has nothing to do with the crime. This is a most welcome development, even if over 40 years late.

Claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are the weapon of choice for capital defense lawyers who want to retry their state-court cases in federal court. The most common line of attack is to find something about the defendant’s background that the trial lawyer did not present, proclaim it to be critical evidence that would have turned the whole case around, and denounce the trial lawyer as incompetent because he did not present it. The evidence need not have any substantial weight if the murderer wins the judge selection lottery and draws judges who approach every capital case as an exercise in searching for an excuse to overturn the sentence. Continue reading . . .

A SCOTUS Warning Shot on Small Juries

Historically, trial juries were twelve people. Is this number constitutionally required? The Supreme Court said no 54 years ago in Williams v. Florida. The decision was 7-1, with Justice Marshall dissenting alone on this point.

However, the Supreme Court’s views on such matters have changed, and four years ago the high court dumped a precedent approving nonunanimous juries, despite the reliance of states on that precedent. See Ramos v. Louisiana. Today the Supreme Court declined to take up a Florida case challenging the Williams precedent, Cunningham v. Florida, but Justice Gorsuch fired a warning shot across the bow of states that allow juries of less than 12 in criminal cases. Continue reading . . .

The Consequences of Early Release

Leniency to the guilty is cruelty to the innocent far too often. CWB Chicago reports yet another example. Zebedee Thomas has been charged in Cook County with rape and other crimes committed last August. A DNA match confirms identity. Thomas previously pleaded guilty to a sexual assault on a 7-year-old committed while a juvenile. In 2022, he was sentenced to four years for unlawful imprisonment in Kentucky.

Why was a repeating violent criminal who had been sentenced to four years in prison back on the street the very next year to commit yet another horrific crime? Continue reading . . .

Memorial Day 2024

Let us take a moment today to remember those who gave the last full measure of devotion in the service of our country and the cause of liberty.

Alabama to Execute Double Murderer

An Alabama criminal convicted of the brutal 2004 murder and robbery of an elderly couple is scheduled to be executed by lethal injection on May 30.  Ivana Hrynkiw of Huntsville Real-Time News reports that last week Chief U.S. District Judge Emily Marks rejected Jamie Ray Mills’ petition for a stay of execution noting that:

“The practice of filing lawsuits and requests for stay of execution at the last minute where the facts were known well in advance is ineffective, unworkable, and must stop.  The Court acknowledges that lawyers representing death row inmates set to be executed unquestionably owe a duty to their clients. However, these lawyers are also officers of the court. The act of filing a civil action and then a request for injunctive relief after unjustified delay often appears to be legal manipulation rather than genuine legal advocacy.”

UPDATE:  Mills was executed without incident at 6:26 PM on May 30.

Continue reading . . .

Portland Follow-Up

Following up on Tuesday’s post on the Multnomah County District Attorney election, the Oregonian has called the race for challenger Nathan Vasquez over the Soros-backed incumbent Mike Schmidt. Vasquez’s margin is 8% on partial returns Wednesday afternoon and projected to be 5% in the final tally. “The Oregonian/OregonLive determined Schmidt has no statistical path to victory.” Continue reading . . .

SCOTUS Unties ACCA Hemp Knot

In the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA), Congress prescribed severe punishment for people with extensive criminal records who violate federal gun laws. The priors are generally state offenses, so there is a problem matching up criminal laws from different jurisdictions. Under the “categorical” approach the Supreme Court has developed, mismatches often spring loose criminals whose actual conduct meets the definition of the crime that Congress sought to include, frustrating the intent of the law. The Supreme Court has had to decide many cases on this topic, and today’s decision in Brown v. United States is the latest installment.

This decision involves two cases, one from Florida and one from Pennsylvania. In both cases, the drug dealers in question dealt in drugs that remain illegal under federal law. Between the times of their state drug-dealing crimes and their federal weapons sentencing, though, the federal government narrowed its definitions of controlled substances so that the state and federal laws were no longer a perfect match. Should that get them off? Three justices voted for that undeserved escape on a technicality, but the majority of six did not. Continue reading . . .

The Revolution Reaches Portland

Multnomah County in Oregon, which has not voted for a republican president since 1960, is poised to replace its uber-progressive, Soros funded District Attorney with a former republican law-and-order prosecutor.  A piece by Johnathan Martin in Politico reports that the current DA, Mike Schmidt, was swept into office during the George Floyd riots in 2020 with 77% of the vote.  Schmidt ran on the same criminal justice reform platform as other Soros-bankrolled prosecutors including Chicago’s Kim Foxx, San Francisco’s Chesa Boudin, and Los Angeles DA George Gascon.  The main tenet of that platform is that police, prosecutors and punishment are racist constructs of the white male ruling class and social justice requires that they be abandoned.  UPDATE:  Schmidt was defeated Tuesday by longtime prosecutor Nathan Vasquez with 54% of the vote.

Continue reading . . .

Pound Cake at 20 Years

Twenty years ago today, at an NAACP event commemorating the golden anniversary of Brown v. Board of Education, Bill Cosby gave a speech that has come to be known as the Pound Cake Speech. Cosby was a towering figure at the time, a major star in the entertainment industry. He triggered an earthquake by delivering a message that a great many people did not want to hear.

Looking at the incarcerated, these are not political criminals. These are people going around stealing Coca Cola. People getting shot in the back of the head over a piece of pound cake! Then we all run out and are outraged: “The cops shouldn’t have shot him.” What the hell was he doing with the pound cake in his hand? I wanted a piece of pound cake just as bad as anybody else. And I looked at it and I had no money. And something called parenting said if you get caught with it you’re going to embarrass your mother.” Not, “You’re going to get your butt kicked.” No. “You’re going to embarrass your mother.” “You’re going to embarrass your family.”

Cosby turned out to be a horribly inappropriate messenger, but his message was spot on then and remains true today. His downfall was fully justified, but a tragic side-effect was that no one with the stature that he had then has picked up the baton. Continue reading . . .