{"id":11732,"date":"2025-10-20T08:54:48","date_gmt":"2025-10-20T15:54:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/?p=11732"},"modified":"2025-10-20T08:56:12","modified_gmt":"2025-10-20T15:56:12","slug":"guns-and-drug-users","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/?p=11732","title":{"rendered":"Guns and Drug Users"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>This morning the U.S. Supreme Court took up yet another Second Amendment case,\u00a0<em>United States v. Hemani<\/em>, No. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/search.aspx?filename=\/docket\/docketfiles\/html\/public\/24-1234.html\">24-1234<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The wide-ranging federal gun control statute (18 U.S.C. \u00a7 922) prohibits gun possession by, among many others, &#8220;(g) &#8230; any person &#8230; (3) who is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802)).&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Does that law sweep too broadly? The federal courts of appeals are divided.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>The Fifth Circuit held last year that there is \u201cno historical justification for disarming a sober citizen not presently under an impairing influence\u201d even though that person regularly uses illegal drugs. It applied that precedent in the present case.\u00a0 Conflicting decisions are described in the Government&#8217;s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/DocketPDF\/24\/24-1234\/362144\/20250602174403309_HemaniPetition.pdf\">certiorari petition<\/a> (i.e., its request that the Supreme Court take up the case):<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The decision below also warrants further review because it forms part of a three-way circuit conflict. One court, the Seventh Circuit, has held that Section 922(g)(3) complies with the Second Amendment, at least as a general matter. In <em>United States v. Yancey<\/em>, 621 F.3d 681 (2010), the Seventh Circuit concluded that the Amendment allows Congress to disarm \u201ccategories\u201d of \u201cpresumptively risky people\u201d and that \u201chabitual drug abusers\u201d form one such category. <em>Id<\/em>. at 683; see <em>id<\/em>. at 682-687. Although <em>Yancey<\/em> predated <em>Bruen<\/em>, it relied on the history-and-tradition test that <em>Bruen<\/em> approved, not on the levels-of-scrutiny approach that <em>Bruen<\/em> rejected. See id. at 683-686 (drawing analogies to historical laws imposing categorical restrictions). District courts in the Seventh Circuit have accordingly continued to follow <em>Yancey<\/em> even after <em>Bruen<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>A second court, the Eighth Circuit, has declared that Section 922(g)(3) violates the Second Amendment in a wide range of applications. It has concluded that \u201c[n]othing in our tradition allows disarmament simply because [a defendant] belongs to a category of people, drug users, that Congress has categorically deemed dangerous.\u201d <em>United States v. Cooper<\/em>, 127 F.4th 1092, 1096 (8th Cir. 2025). In its view, the Second Amendment instead requires some form of \u201cindividualized assessment.\u201d <em>Ibid<\/em>. Under the Eighth Circuit\u2019s approach, the government may apply Section 922(g)(3) only if it can make a case-by-case showing that drug use caused the defendant to \u201cpose a credible threat to the physical safety of others,\u201d to act like someone who is \u201cmentally ill,\u201d or to \u201cinduce terror.\u201d <em>Ibid<\/em>. (citation omitted). Applying that approach, the Eighth Circuit has vacated two Section 922(g)(3) convictions, remanding the cases for the district courts to decide in the first instance whether disarming the defendants \u201cline[s] up with the case-by-case historical tradition.\u201d <em>Id<\/em>. at 1097; see <em>United States v. Baxter<\/em>, 127 F.4th 1087, 1090-1092 (8th Cir. 2025).<\/p>\n<p>The Fifth Circuit has adopted an even stricter test. On its approach, the government generally may apply Section 922(g)(3) only to those who were \u201cintoxicated at the time\u201d they possessed firearms. <em>Connelly<\/em>, 117 F.4th at 272. The court also has left open the possibility that the government could \u201c[p]erhaps\u201d apply the statute in a case where the drugs were \u201cso powerful\u201d that they left someone \u201cpermanently impaired in a way comparable to severe mental illness.\u201d <em>Id<\/em>. at 277.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Why the present Supreme Court considers Second Amendment cases to be worthy of such a large portion of its docket when anti-original interpretations of other provisions of the Constitution cause miscarriages of justice on a much broader scale in criminal cases nationwide every day remains a mystery.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This morning the U.S. Supreme Court took up yet another Second Amendment case,\u00a0United States v. Hemani, No. 24-1234. The wide-ranging federal gun control statute (18 U.S.C. \u00a7 922) prohibits gun possession by, among many others, &#8220;(g) &#8230; any person &#8230; (3) who is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802)).&#8221; Does that law sweep too broadly? The federal courts of appeals are divided.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[20,56],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11732","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-firearms","category-u-s-supreme-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.8 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Guns and Drug Users - Crime &amp; Consequences<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/?p=11732\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Guns and Drug Users - Crime &amp; Consequences\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"This morning the U.S. Supreme Court took up yet another Second Amendment case,\u00a0United States v. Hemani, No. 24-1234. The wide-ranging federal gun control statute (18 U.S.C. \u00a7 922) prohibits gun possession by, among many others, &#8220;(g) &#8230; any person &#8230; (3) who is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802)).&#8221; Does that law sweep too broadly? The federal courts of appeals are divided.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/?p=11732\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Crime &amp; Consequences\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CriminalJusticeLegalFoundation\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-10-20T15:54:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-10-20T15:56:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/FB_DefaultLJ.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"300\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"400\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kent Scheidegger\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kent Scheidegger\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/?p=11732\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/?p=11732\",\"name\":\"Guns and Drug Users - Crime &amp; Consequences\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-10-20T15:54:48+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-10-20T15:56:12+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/#\/schema\/person\/1ab62da9ed4ddd3a58d70c77eef37356\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/?p=11732#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/?p=11732\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/?p=11732#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Guns and Drug Users\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/\",\"name\":\"Crime &amp; Consequences\",\"description\":\"Crime and criminal law\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/#\/schema\/person\/1ab62da9ed4ddd3a58d70c77eef37356\",\"name\":\"Kent Scheidegger\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.cjlf.org\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Guns and Drug Users - Crime &amp; Consequences","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/?p=11732","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Guns and Drug Users - Crime &amp; Consequences","og_description":"This morning the U.S. Supreme Court took up yet another Second Amendment case,\u00a0United States v. Hemani, No. 24-1234. The wide-ranging federal gun control statute (18 U.S.C. \u00a7 922) prohibits gun possession by, among many others, &#8220;(g) &#8230; any person &#8230; (3) who is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802)).&#8221; Does that law sweep too broadly? The federal courts of appeals are divided.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/?p=11732","og_site_name":"Crime &amp; Consequences","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CriminalJusticeLegalFoundation\/","article_published_time":"2025-10-20T15:54:48+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-10-20T15:56:12+00:00","og_image":[{"width":300,"height":400,"url":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/FB_DefaultLJ.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Kent Scheidegger","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kent Scheidegger","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/?p=11732","url":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/?p=11732","name":"Guns and Drug Users - Crime &amp; Consequences","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-10-20T15:54:48+00:00","dateModified":"2025-10-20T15:56:12+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/#\/schema\/person\/1ab62da9ed4ddd3a58d70c77eef37356"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/?p=11732#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/?p=11732"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/?p=11732#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Guns and Drug Users"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/","name":"Crime &amp; Consequences","description":"Crime and criminal law","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/#\/schema\/person\/1ab62da9ed4ddd3a58d70c77eef37356","name":"Kent Scheidegger","sameAs":["https:\/\/www.cjlf.org"],"url":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11732","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=11732"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11732\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11734,"href":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11732\/revisions\/11734"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=11732"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=11732"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=11732"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}