{"id":2400,"date":"2020-11-18T13:07:22","date_gmt":"2020-11-18T21:07:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/?p=2400"},"modified":"2020-11-18T13:32:49","modified_gmt":"2020-11-18T21:32:49","slug":"dc-circuit-rejects-inmates-lethal-injection-claim","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/?p=2400","title":{"rendered":"DC Circuit Rejects Inmates&#8217; Lethal Injection Claim"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In a somewhat convoluted but important ruling, a liberal-dominated panel of the DC Circuit today affirmed a lower court&#8217;s rejection of several death row inmates&#8217; request for an injunction against the Bureau of Prisons&#8217; use of unprescribed drugs to use in lethal injections.\u00a0 Ed Whelan has a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nationalreview.com\/bench-memos\/divided-d-c-circuit-ruling-on-fdas-authority-over-drugs-used-in-lethal-injections\/?fbclid=IwAR2yFoDgLKZCtyOJh8ZEXgHbqTdUgPpGWJ763TE7TLFt70xLuyhpBle75DI\">quick analysis<\/a>.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Ed&#8217;s article in <em>Bench Memos<\/em> begins:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>In a complicated set of opinions today (in\u00a0<em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.cadc.uscourts.gov\/internet\/opinions.nsf\/8AAFFCEAFAF9D1A085258624002EFEF2\/$file\/20-5329-1871726.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">In re Federal Bureau of Prisons\u2019 Execution Protocol Cases<\/a><\/em>), a divided D.C. Circuit panel denied relief to federal death-row inmates seeking an injunction against their execution. The case involves several legal issues (including some on which the panel was unanimous), but I\u2019m going to focus here on the three-way divide among the panel members on the legal questions arising under the Federal Food, Drug &amp; Cosmetic Act, or FDCA (not to be confused with the legal issue concerning the Federal Death Penalty Act, or FDPA).<\/p>\n<p>1. Let\u2019s start with the per curiam opinion, which only Judge Patricia Millett (an Obama appointee) joined in full\u2014and of which she was presumably the lead author. That opinion, applying what it regarded as binding circuit precedent, concluded, first, that the FDPA gives the Food and Drug Administration jurisdiction over drugs used in lethal injections; that plaintiffs were entitled to sue under the Administrative Procedures Act to challenge unlawful agency action; and that the Federal Bureau of Prison\u2019s protocol for execution was unlawful \u201cto the extent that it allows the dispensation and administration of pentobarbital without a prescription.\u201d (Pp. 21-24.)<\/p>\n<p>But the per curiam opinion also concludes that the district court properly declined to award the plaintiffs a permanent injunction against the unprescribed use of pentobarbital. In a single paragraph, the opinion states that the plaintiffs could not demonstrate that they were likely to suffer irreparable harm \u201cdue to the unprescribed use of pentobarbital\u201d because the lower court \u201cspecifically found\u201d that the evidence did not support their contention that they were \u201clikely to suffer flash pulmonary edema while still conscious.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>2. In a separate opinion, Judge Cornelia Pillard (also an Obama appointee) agreed that the Bureau of Prison\u2019s use of pentobarbital without a prescription was unlawful. But in her judgment \u201c[t]hat conclusion alone requires a stay of the pending executions until the government complies\u201d with the FDCA. She argued that the government\u2019s decision to ignore the prescription requirement \u201csubjects those affected to substantial and unnecessary risks of bodily injury, illness, and suffering\u201d and that exposure to those risks is irreparable injury.<\/p>\n<p>3. In a separate opinion cutting in the other direction, Judge Neomi Rao (a Trump appointee) disputed the majority\u2019s conclusion that binding circuit precedent governs the FDPA issue. One supposed circuit precedent, she argued, \u201cmerely assumed the applicability of the FDCA to lethal injection drugs\u201d in the context of distinct legal question. And the other supposed circuit precedent conflicts with a later decision by the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n<p>Addressing the issue afresh, Rao concluded that \u201capplying the requirements of the FDCA to lethal injection drugs does not cohere with the text and structure of the whole statute.\u201d In particular, \u201cthe prescription requirement is designed with the therapeutic benefit of the patient in mind\u201d and should not be applied to drugs used for the purpose of lethal injection.<\/p>\n<p>Rao also argued that the plaintiffs cannot, in any event, challenge the FDA\u2019s decision not to enforce the FDCA against drugs used for lethal injection.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In a somewhat convoluted but important ruling, a liberal-dominated panel of the DC Circuit today affirmed a lower court&#8217;s rejection of several death row inmates&#8217; request for an injunction against the Bureau of Prisons&#8217; use of unprescribed drugs to use in lethal injections.\u00a0 Ed Whelan has a quick analysis.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2400","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-death-penalty"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.8 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>DC Circuit Rejects Inmates&#039; Lethal Injection Claim - Crime &amp; Consequences<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/?p=2400\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"DC Circuit Rejects Inmates&#039; Lethal Injection Claim - Crime &amp; Consequences\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In a somewhat convoluted but important ruling, a liberal-dominated panel of the DC Circuit today affirmed a lower court&#8217;s rejection of several death row inmates&#8217; request for an injunction against the Bureau of Prisons&#8217; use of unprescribed drugs to use in lethal injections.\u00a0 Ed Whelan has a quick analysis.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/?p=2400\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Crime &amp; Consequences\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CriminalJusticeLegalFoundation\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-11-18T21:07:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-11-18T21:32:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/FB_DefaultLJ.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"300\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"400\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bill Otis\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bill Otis\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/?p=2400\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/?p=2400\",\"name\":\"DC Circuit Rejects Inmates' Lethal Injection Claim - Crime &amp; Consequences\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-11-18T21:07:22+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-11-18T21:32:49+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/#\/schema\/person\/d089f7e65aa652190318c44070da5e6e\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/?p=2400#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/?p=2400\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/?p=2400#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"DC Circuit Rejects Inmates&#8217; Lethal Injection Claim\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/\",\"name\":\"Crime &amp; Consequences\",\"description\":\"Crime and criminal law\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/#\/schema\/person\/d089f7e65aa652190318c44070da5e6e\",\"name\":\"Bill Otis\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/?author=6\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"DC Circuit Rejects Inmates' Lethal Injection Claim - Crime &amp; Consequences","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/?p=2400","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"DC Circuit Rejects Inmates' Lethal Injection Claim - Crime &amp; Consequences","og_description":"In a somewhat convoluted but important ruling, a liberal-dominated panel of the DC Circuit today affirmed a lower court&#8217;s rejection of several death row inmates&#8217; request for an injunction against the Bureau of Prisons&#8217; use of unprescribed drugs to use in lethal injections.\u00a0 Ed Whelan has a quick analysis.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/?p=2400","og_site_name":"Crime &amp; Consequences","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CriminalJusticeLegalFoundation\/","article_published_time":"2020-11-18T21:07:22+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-11-18T21:32:49+00:00","og_image":[{"width":300,"height":400,"url":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/FB_DefaultLJ.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Bill Otis","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bill Otis","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/?p=2400","url":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/?p=2400","name":"DC Circuit Rejects Inmates' Lethal Injection Claim - Crime &amp; Consequences","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-11-18T21:07:22+00:00","dateModified":"2020-11-18T21:32:49+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/#\/schema\/person\/d089f7e65aa652190318c44070da5e6e"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/?p=2400#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/?p=2400"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/?p=2400#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"DC Circuit Rejects Inmates&#8217; Lethal Injection Claim"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/","name":"Crime &amp; Consequences","description":"Crime and criminal law","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/#\/schema\/person\/d089f7e65aa652190318c44070da5e6e","name":"Bill Otis","url":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/?author=6"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2400","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2400"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2400\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2403,"href":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2400\/revisions\/2403"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2400"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2400"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.crimeandconsequences.blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2400"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}