Author: Kent Scheidegger

A Quiet Morning at SCOTUS

Not much action at the high court today. The court issued one opinion in a Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act case regarding suing foreign governments for sponsoring terrorism.

The court did not take up any cases for full briefing and argument. There is a big push by a number of groups to attack the doctrine of qualified immunity and make it easier to sue police officers. That would create one more reason to discourage people from entering the field, as if there were not enough already. It would expose officers to being sued for actions that were legal under precedents in effect at the time of the action but which a creative lawyer asks a court to declare illegal. Continue reading . . .

D.C. Circuit Will Not Rehear Execution Case

Last month, a splintered three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit vacated an injunction against executions issued by the D.C. District Court. See this post. Today, the court turned down the murderers’ request to rehear the case before all the active judges (except for CJ Srinivasan, who is recused). No judge of the court even called for a vote on it. Continue reading . . .

USCA9 Gets Quill-Lashing From Unanimous SCOTUS

The U.S. Supreme Court severely admonished the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit today for reaching out to recast a case to present issues not raised by the parties. The opinion was unanimous, written by Justice Ginsburg. The Ninth Circuit panel, at the time of the recasting, consisted of Judges Reinhardt, Tashima, and Berzon.

In United States v. Sineneng-Smith, No. 19-67, the high court disposed of the case saying,  “we vacate the Ninth Circuit’s judgment and remand the case for reconsideration shorn of the overbreadth inquiry interjected by the appellate panel and bearing a fair resemblance to the case shaped by the parties.” In judicial-speak, that is a stern rebuke. Continue reading . . .