Category: USDoJ

Death Penalty Sought for UnitedHealth Killer

U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi has decided to seek the death penalty for Luigi Mangione. The press release says:

“Luigi Mangione’s murder of Brian Thompson — an innocent man and father of two young children — was a premeditated, cold-blooded assassination that shocked America. After careful consideration, I have directed federal prosecutors to seek the death penalty in this case as we carry out President Trump’s agenda to stop violent crime and Make America Safe Again.” Continue reading . . .

Bondi Nomination Moves Forward

The U.S. Senate voted this evening to break the filibuster on the nomination of Pamela Bondi to be U.S. Attorney General. The vote was 52-46. Senators Graham and Fetterman did not vote. It is not clear whether they were present. Ms. Bondi should be confirmed when the substantive vote is taken.

Update: Pamela Bondi was confirmed as Attorney General on February 4 by a 54-46 vote.

Executive Order on Death Penalty

Among the torrent of executive orders issuing from the White House is one titled “Restoring the Death Penalty and Protecting Public Safety.”

One of its provisions directs the Attorney General to assert federal jurisdiction and seek the death penalty “for every federal capital crime involving: (i) The murder of a law-enforcement officer; or (ii) A capital crime committed by an alien illegally present in this country.” We shall see how that works in actual practice.

Also included is a directive to help states obtain execution drugs and to get DOJ off its tush with certifying states under the comatose Chapter 154 fast track program.

Along with the latter, the illegal poison pill inserted by the Obama Administration on its way out the door needs to be repealed.
Continue reading . . .

A Problematic Attorney General Nomination

President-elect Trump has nominated Rep. Matt Gaetz to be Attorney General of the United States. If he had intentionally set out to choose the Republican with the least chance of being confirmed, he could hardly have done better.

With a 53-47 Senate and his Vice-President having a tie-breaking vote, the 47 Democrats plus 4 Republicans can block a nominee. Mr. Gaetz is a disruptive, divisive figure, widely despised among his former colleagues in the House Republican Caucus. Can he attract unanimous support, or anything close to it, among Republicans in the upper chamber? That seems unlikely. An appeal to party loyalty and unity in support of a man who is the epitome of the exact opposite does not seem to be a winning argument. Continue reading . . .

Intimidating Justices and Their Children at Home Is Illegal as Well as Disgusting

After the unprecedented leak of a draft of a possible SCOTUS decision on the case overruling Roe v. Wade, pro-abortion activists have decided it would be a good idea to flock en masse outside the neighborhood homes of the Justices to make sure they know that, if the “wrong” decision were handed come late June, they would, in Chuck Schmer’s words, “pay the price.”

Gathering in menacing mobs at the homes of Justices has been defended by exactly those people who, for four years, were loudly aghast at the “breaking of norms.”  But as it turns out, the mob activity is not merely disgusting but illegal  —  or at least such is the view of that right-wing rag, the Washington Post.  Its article is quoted in part below.

Continue reading . . .

Should the Justice Department Monitor School Board Meetings?

In a word, no.

In ten words, ominous FBI surveillance like this would make Richard Nixon blush.

Clark Neily of the libertarian Cato Institute and I often disagree  —  about drug legalization, police behavior and prosecutorial power.  But we found it easy to collaborate on an op-ed about Merrick Garland’s memo enlisting the power of the federal government to intimidate parents who voice emphatic dissent at local school board meetings.

Continue reading . . .

Dangerous New DOJ Policy On Chokeholds and “No-Knock” Warrants

A new memo released from the Department of Justice (DOJ) by Attorney General Merrick Garland makes policy changes that have the potential to endanger the lives of federal agents, as well as the limit the seizure of criminal evidence.  According to the memo released September 14th, 2021, the DOJ is changing policy effective immediately regarding the use of chokeholds and “no-knock” warrants.  The change appears inspired by the deaths of George Floyd and Breonna Taylor.  Officer Derek Chauvin was convicted of causing Floyd’s death by using a form of a chokehold to pin him down after he resisted arrest.  Breonna Taylor died in a shootout which began when her current boyfriend shot at police executing a “no-knock” warrant to arrest her former boyfriend, drug dealer Jamarcus Glover.   Continue reading . . .

Merrick Garland Suspends Use of the Federal Death Penalty

Attorney General Merrick Garland yesterday announced that he is suspending use of the federal death penalty:

“The Department of Justice must ensure that everyone in the federal criminal justice system is not only afforded the rights guaranteed by the Constitution and laws of the United States, but is also treated fairly and humanely,” said Attorney General Garland. “That obligation has special force in capital cases.”

What to make of this announcement, and of its timing?

Continue reading . . .