The Correct Outcome in Vega v. Tekoh
Earlier this week, the Supreme Court heard argument in Vega v. Tekoh. That case presents the question whether a plaintiff has a civil remedy against a police officer under 42 U.S.C. 1983 for obtaining a statement in violation of the Constitution, when the statement was later admitted at his trial. In Vega, the statement was obtained from a suspect in custody without having first given him his Miranda warnings. In other words, one pivotal question is whether or not Miranda warnings are required by the Constitution, in particular the Fifth Amendment.
An earlier case, Dickerson v. United States, 530 U.S. 428 (2000) seems to suggest that they are. In fact they aren’t, and for that reason the police officer should win this case.
