Category: Public Order

Taking a Bite Out of Homelessness

An article in today’s Wall Street Journal notes that California has spent $17 billion on programs to end homelessness and the problem has only gotten worse.  California is home to more than 171,000 homeless individuals, according to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, a 6.2% increase since 2020.  Roughly 67%, or more than 115,000 are unsheltered, meaning that they’re living outside.  While liberal politicians often characterize homelessness as a housing problem, with some even calling the homeless “guests,”  in reality the homeless population is primarily made up of drug addicts and the mentally ill, along with some vagrants who actually prefer living on the streets.  An OpEd in the California Globe by four law enforcement professionals suggest that there is a proven way for the state to eliminate homelessness in one year.

Continue reading . . .

Homelessness and Crime in California

The City Journal has a special issue titled Can California Be Golden Again? The issue describes, as Michael Shellenberger puts it, how “ruinous policies have transformed California from a symbol of progress to a cautionary tale for the nation.”  Stephen Eide has an article titled The Encampment State on homelessness, a problem that is now far worse in California than in earlier times, bad as those were, and far worse than it is at present in other regions of the country with better functioning governments. Continue reading . . .

Indirect Consequences of Crime

Map of San Francisco Shopping Closures

Shopping Closures Map from SF Chronicle

A huge but common mistake in public policy is to consider only the direct effects of a policy and ignore the indirect effects. Crime harms the direct victims most, but ultimately the indirect effects corrode the structure of society.

San Francisco’s once-famous shopping scene is imploding, and crime is a major reason why.

In the latest blow to downtown, Nordstrom, an upscale anchor store in the Westfield San Francisco Centre, will depart at the end of its lease. Continue reading . . .

300 LA Traffic Deaths in 2022, Activists Blame Streets

A story by Dakota Smith in the Los Angeles Times reports that traffic deaths in the city have hit a two-decade high.  More than half of the deaths involved vehicles hitting pedestrians or people on bicycles, both which significantly increased compared to prior years.  This comes as the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration reported that traffic fatalities nationally remained flat over 2022.  What is causing this increase?  The Los Angeles Times did not inquire into how many traffic fatalities involved an intoxicated driver.  With an estimated 69,000 homeless in LA, many using drugs, riding bicycles and wandering the streets, it might be that pedestrians and bike riders are part of the problem, but this was not reported.  Last March, the Los Angeles Police Commission announced that LAPD Officers were no longer authorized to make traffic stops.  This limits officers from pulling over cars weaving, turning without a signal, failing to stop at a stop sign or driving with an expired registration.  Losing the ability to stop a driver who is intoxicated and/or blatantly ignoring traffic laws might actually encourage traffic fatalities.  This concern was not reported in the Times.

Continue reading . . .

The Consequences of No Consequences

It is a basic principle of human behavior that incentives matter. If people have an incentive to do X and we reduce the adverse consequences of doing X, then more people will do X. People who think that crime is somehow exempt from this principle, and that we can therefore reduce or eliminate consequences with no increase in crime, are living in fantasy land.

The latest example comes to us from the nation’s capital, noted in this editorial in the WSJ. People have an obvious incentive to ride buses without paying. If you shrink the consequences of doing that to almost nothing, will more people do it, draining revenue from an already under-funded system? Continue reading . . .

Gov. Brown Tricked Voters on Prop. 57

Veteran California political commentator Dan Walters has this column at CalMatters.  The headline is, “Gov. Brown pushed for softer treatment of violent felons.” The “tricked” allegation comes farther down in the text. Here is the summary:

Fingers of blame are being pointed about the early prison release of a man accused of being one of the shooters in a downtown Sacramento gang shootout. But the politician most responsible is former Gov. Jerry Brown.

Brown may well be “most responsible,” but that should not let the present governor off the hook. Gov. Newsom has taken powers that Brown left him and adopted measures for the benefit of violent criminals that go considerably beyond what Brown adopted. Continue reading . . .