Riots, Arson, Policing and the Election
Bret Stephens is an especially insightful writer for, of all things, the New York Times. His column yesterday asks some questions the country very much needs to ponder:
Can the left be honest that the tragedies unfolding today in American cities are as much the story of insufficient policing as they are of abusive policing? Does it get that “law and order” is a precondition to civil liberty, not an impediment to it? Is it willing to say that the American founders who bequeathed us the institutions of liberal democracy should be honored, not despised? And does Joe Biden have the nerve to stand up to the extremes in his own party, or does he just mean to appease them?
His piece makes other painful points as well.

In May, the government moved to dismiss the cases against Gen. Michael Flynn. Normally, the judge would routinely grant such a motion. If the parties are agreed, there is generally nothing for a court to decide. In this case, though, the judge did not grant the motion right away but appointed an amicus curiae to argue against it. Gen. Flynn asked the court of appeals for an “extraordinary writ,” ordering the district court immediately grant the motion to dismiss. See 