No, Defendant Does Not Get Off Scot-Free for a Technical Error
This post on March 16 discussed the Supreme Court case of Smith v. United States, No. 21-1576. Smith had been tried in the wrong district, and his conviction was reversed on appeal. He claimed that the venue was an element of the offense, such that the Double Jeopardy Clause precluded his retrial in the correct district.
I wrote then, “When this case first came up, I thought the claim to be so obviously wrong that there was no chance the Court would buy it. I still think so.”
Sure enough, the high court today decided that Smith can be retried. Unanimously.
The opinion is available here.
More opinions are expected tomorrow.

One wonders why this case was granted . . . .
Circuit split, probably.